MAYBE 18.822
H-Termination proof of /home/matraf/haskell/eval_FullyBlown_Fast/empty.hs
H-Termination of the given Haskell-Program with start terms could not be shown:
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
mainModule Main
| ((enumFrom :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) |
module Main where
If Reductions:
The following If expression
if primGEqNatS x y then Succ (primDivNatS (primMinusNatS x y) (Succ y)) else Zero
is transformed to
primDivNatS0 | x y True | = Succ (primDivNatS (primMinusNatS x y) (Succ y)) |
primDivNatS0 | x y False | = Zero |
The following If expression
if primGEqNatS x y then primModNatS (primMinusNatS x y) (Succ y) else Succ x
is transformed to
primModNatS0 | x y True | = primModNatS (primMinusNatS x y) (Succ y) |
primModNatS0 | x y False | = Succ x |
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
mainModule Main
| ((enumFrom :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) |
module Main where
Replaced joker patterns by fresh variables and removed binding patterns.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
mainModule Main
| ((enumFrom :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) |
module Main where
Cond Reductions:
The following Function with conditions
gcd' | x 0 | = x |
gcd' | x y | = gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
is transformed to
gcd' | x xz | = gcd'2 x xz |
gcd' | x y | = gcd'0 x y |
gcd'0 | x y | = gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
gcd'1 | True x xz | = x |
gcd'1 | yu yv yw | = gcd'0 yv yw |
gcd'2 | x xz | = gcd'1 (xz == 0) x xz |
gcd'2 | yx yy | = gcd'0 yx yy |
The following Function with conditions
gcd | 0 0 | = error [] |
gcd | x y | =
gcd' (abs x) (abs y) |
where |
gcd' | x 0 | = x |
gcd' | x y | = gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
|
|
is transformed to
gcd | yz zu | = gcd3 yz zu |
gcd | x y | = gcd0 x y |
gcd0 | x y | =
gcd' (abs x) (abs y) |
where |
gcd' | x xz | = gcd'2 x xz |
gcd' | x y | = gcd'0 x y |
|
|
gcd'0 | x y | = gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
|
|
gcd'1 | True x xz | = x |
gcd'1 | yu yv yw | = gcd'0 yv yw |
|
|
gcd'2 | x xz | = gcd'1 (xz == 0) x xz |
gcd'2 | yx yy | = gcd'0 yx yy |
|
|
gcd1 | True yz zu | = error [] |
gcd1 | zv zw zx | = gcd0 zw zx |
gcd2 | True yz zu | = gcd1 (zu == 0) yz zu |
gcd2 | zy zz vuu | = gcd0 zz vuu |
gcd3 | yz zu | = gcd2 (yz == 0) yz zu |
gcd3 | vuv vuw | = gcd0 vuv vuw |
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
absReal1 | x True | = x |
absReal1 | x False | = absReal0 x otherwise |
absReal0 | x True | = `negate` x |
absReal2 | x | = absReal1 x (x >= 0) |
The following Function with conditions
is transformed to
undefined0 | True | = undefined |
undefined1 | | = undefined0 False |
The following Function with conditions
reduce | x y |
| | y == 0 | |
| | otherwise |
= | x `quot` d :% (y `quot` d) |
|
|
where | |
|
is transformed to
reduce2 | x y | =
reduce1 x y (y == 0) |
where | |
|
reduce0 | x y True | = x `quot` d :% (y `quot` d) |
|
|
reduce1 | x y True | = error [] |
reduce1 | x y False | = reduce0 x y otherwise |
|
|
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
mainModule Main
| ((enumFrom :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) |
module Main where
Let/Where Reductions:
The bindings of the following Let/Where expression
reduce1 x y (y == 0) |
where | |
|
reduce0 | x y True | = x `quot` d :% (y `quot` d) |
|
|
reduce1 | x y True | = error [] |
reduce1 | x y False | = reduce0 x y otherwise |
|
are unpacked to the following functions on top level
reduce2D | vux vuy | = gcd vux vuy |
reduce2Reduce0 | vux vuy x y True | = x `quot` reduce2D vux vuy :% (y `quot` reduce2D vux vuy) |
reduce2Reduce1 | vux vuy x y True | = error [] |
reduce2Reduce1 | vux vuy x y False | = reduce2Reduce0 vux vuy x y otherwise |
The bindings of the following Let/Where expression
gcd' (abs x) (abs y) |
where |
gcd' | x xz | = gcd'2 x xz |
gcd' | x y | = gcd'0 x y |
|
|
gcd'0 | x y | = gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
|
|
gcd'1 | True x xz | = x |
gcd'1 | yu yv yw | = gcd'0 yv yw |
|
|
gcd'2 | x xz | = gcd'1 (xz == 0) x xz |
gcd'2 | yx yy | = gcd'0 yx yy |
|
are unpacked to the following functions on top level
gcd0Gcd'1 | True x xz | = x |
gcd0Gcd'1 | yu yv yw | = gcd0Gcd'0 yv yw |
gcd0Gcd'2 | x xz | = gcd0Gcd'1 (xz == 0) x xz |
gcd0Gcd'2 | yx yy | = gcd0Gcd'0 yx yy |
gcd0Gcd' | x xz | = gcd0Gcd'2 x xz |
gcd0Gcd' | x y | = gcd0Gcd'0 x y |
gcd0Gcd'0 | x y | = gcd0Gcd' y (x `rem` y) |
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
mainModule Main
| ((enumFrom :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) |
module Main where
Num Reduction: All numbers are transformed to thier corresponding representation with Pos, Neg, Succ and Zero.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ Narrow
mainModule Main
| (enumFrom :: Ratio Int -> [Ratio Int]) |
module Main where
Haskell To QDPs
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primMulNat(Succ(vuz31000)) → new_primMulNat(vuz31000)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primMulNat(Succ(vuz31000)) → new_primMulNat(vuz31000)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primPlusNat(Succ(vuz6700), Succ(vuz150)) → new_primPlusNat(vuz6700, vuz150)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primPlusNat(Succ(vuz6700), Succ(vuz150)) → new_primPlusNat(vuz6700, vuz150)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS(vuz1090, vuz1100)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primMinusNatS(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS(vuz1090, vuz1100)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz151, vuz152) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz151), vuz152), vuz152)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz148, vuz149) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz148), vuz149), vuz149)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Zero), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero, new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(vuz157, vuz158) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(vuz158)), vuz157)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Zero, Succ(vuz1870))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Zero)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(vuz200, vuz201) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(vuz201)), vuz200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Zero)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs with 5 less nodes.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(vuz157, vuz158) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(vuz158)), vuz157)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz148, vuz149) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz148), vuz149), vuz149)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz148, vuz149) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz148), vuz149), vuz149) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(vuz157, vuz158) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(vuz158)), vuz157)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(x0), Zero)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(x0), Zero)
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ RuleRemovalProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(x0), Zero)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [15] with the following polynomial ordering [25], at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(x0), Zero)
Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(Succ(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1
POL(Zero) = 0
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'1(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'11(x1, x2)) = 2 + 2·x1 + x2
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ RuleRemovalProof
↳ QDP
↳ PisEmptyProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(vuz157, vuz158) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(vuz158)), vuz157)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By instantiating [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'12(vuz157, vuz158) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(vuz158)), vuz157) we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(z0)) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(z0))), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(z0)) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(z0))), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
new_gcd0Gcd'1(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [3]:
Non-tuple symbols:
M( new_primMinusNatS0(x1, x2) ) = | | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
Tuple symbols:
M( new_gcd0Gcd'10(x1, ..., x4) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 | + | | · | x4 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'11(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'1(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'12(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'13(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
Matrix type:
We used a basic matrix type which is not further parametrizeable.
As matrix orders are CE-compatible, we used usable rules w.r.t. argument filtering in the order.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'11(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'1(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'11(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 3 less nodes.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ NonInfProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The DP Problem is simplified using the Induction Calculus [18] with the following steps:
Note that final constraints are written in bold face.
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0)), new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200) which results in the following constraint:
(1) (new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(x6)), Succ(x5))=new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(x7))), Succ(x8)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(x7))), Succ(x8))≥new_gcd0Gcd'10(x7, Succ(x8), x7, x8))
We simplified constraint (1) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(2) (new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(x7))), Succ(x5))≥new_gcd0Gcd'10(x7, Succ(x5), x7, x5))
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200), new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161) which results in the following constraint:
(3) (new_gcd0Gcd'10(x13, Succ(x14), x13, x14)=new_gcd0Gcd'10(x15, x16, Zero, Succ(x17)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'10(x15, x16, Zero, Succ(x17))≥new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(x15), x16))
We simplified constraint (3) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(4) (new_gcd0Gcd'10(Zero, Succ(Succ(x17)), Zero, Succ(x17))≥new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(Zero), Succ(Succ(x17))))
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630), new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161) which results in the following constraint:
(5) (new_gcd0Gcd'10(x23, x24, x25, x26)=new_gcd0Gcd'10(x27, x28, Zero, Succ(x29)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'10(x27, x28, Zero, Succ(x29))≥new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(x27), x28))
We simplified constraint (5) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(6) (new_gcd0Gcd'10(x23, x24, Zero, Succ(x29))≥new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(x23), x24))
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0)) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161), new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0)) which results in the following constraint:
(7) (new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(x32), x33)=new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(x35), x36) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(x35), x36)≥new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(x36)), Succ(x35)))
We simplified constraint (7) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(8) (new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(x32), x33)≥new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(x33)), Succ(x32)))
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200), new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630) which results in the following constraint:
(9) (new_gcd0Gcd'10(x43, Succ(x44), x43, x44)=new_gcd0Gcd'10(x45, x46, Succ(x47), Succ(x48)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'10(x45, x46, Succ(x47), Succ(x48))≥new_gcd0Gcd'10(x45, x46, x47, x48))
We simplified constraint (9) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(10) (new_gcd0Gcd'10(Succ(x47), Succ(Succ(x48)), Succ(x47), Succ(x48))≥new_gcd0Gcd'10(Succ(x47), Succ(Succ(x48)), x47, x48))
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630), new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630) which results in the following constraint:
(11) (new_gcd0Gcd'10(x54, x55, x56, x57)=new_gcd0Gcd'10(x58, x59, Succ(x60), Succ(x61)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'10(x58, x59, Succ(x60), Succ(x61))≥new_gcd0Gcd'10(x58, x59, x60, x61))
We simplified constraint (11) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(12) (new_gcd0Gcd'10(x54, x55, Succ(x60), Succ(x61))≥new_gcd0Gcd'10(x54, x55, x60, x61))
To summarize, we get the following constraints P≥ for the following pairs.
- new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
- (new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(x7))), Succ(x5))≥new_gcd0Gcd'10(x7, Succ(x5), x7, x5))
- new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
- (new_gcd0Gcd'10(Zero, Succ(Succ(x17)), Zero, Succ(x17))≥new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(Zero), Succ(Succ(x17))))
- (new_gcd0Gcd'10(x23, x24, Zero, Succ(x29))≥new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(x23), x24))
- new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
- (new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(x32), x33)≥new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(x33)), Succ(x32)))
- new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
- (new_gcd0Gcd'10(Succ(x47), Succ(Succ(x48)), Succ(x47), Succ(x48))≥new_gcd0Gcd'10(Succ(x47), Succ(Succ(x48)), x47, x48))
- (new_gcd0Gcd'10(x54, x55, Succ(x60), Succ(x61))≥new_gcd0Gcd'10(x54, x55, x60, x61))
The constraints for P> respective Pbound are constructed from P≥ where we just replace every occurence of "t ≥ s" in P≥ by "t > s" respective "t ≥ c". Here c stands for the fresh constant used for Pbound.
Using the following integer polynomial ordering the resulting constraints can be solved
Polynomial interpretation [18]:
POL(Pos(x1)) = 0
POL(Succ(x1)) = 1 + x1
POL(Zero) = 0
POL(c) = -1
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'10(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = -1 + x1 - x3 + x4
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'12(x1, x2)) = -1 + x1
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'13(x1, x2)) = -1 - x1 + x2
The following pairs are in P>:
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
The following pairs are in Pbound:
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
There are no usable rules
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ NonInfProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_gcd0Gcd'12(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Pos(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ NonInfProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'10(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3, 4 > 4
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz151, vuz152) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz151), vuz152), vuz152)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Zero, Succ(vuz1870))
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(vuz200, vuz201) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(vuz201)), vuz200)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz151, vuz152) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz151), vuz152), vuz152) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Zero, Succ(vuz1870))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'111(vuz200, vuz201) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(vuz201)), vuz200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs with 1 less node.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(x0), Zero)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(x0), Zero)
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ RuleRemovalProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(x0), Zero)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [15] with the following polynomial ordering [25], at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(x0), Zero)
Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(Succ(x1)) = 1 + 2·x1
POL(Zero) = 0
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'15(x1, x2)) = 2 + 2·x1 + x2
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'17(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ RuleRemovalProof
↳ QDP
↳ PisEmptyProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Zero, Succ(vuz1870))
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(vuz200, vuz201) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(vuz201)), vuz200)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By instantiating [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'111(vuz200, vuz201) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(vuz201)), vuz200) we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Zero, Succ(z0)) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(z0))), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Zero, Succ(z0)) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(z0))), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Zero, Succ(vuz1870))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Zero)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [3]:
Non-tuple symbols:
M( new_primMinusNatS0(x1, x2) ) = | | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
Tuple symbols:
M( new_gcd0Gcd'19(x1, ..., x4) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 | + | | · | x4 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'16(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'111(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'110(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'18(x1, ..., x3) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'15(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'13(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'14(x1, ..., x4) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 | + | | · | x4 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'17(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
Matrix type:
We used a basic matrix type which is not further parametrizeable.
As matrix orders are CE-compatible, we used usable rules w.r.t. argument filtering in the order.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:
none
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [3]:
Non-tuple symbols:
M( new_primMinusNatS0(x1, x2) ) = | | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
Tuple symbols:
M( new_gcd0Gcd'19(x1, ..., x4) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 | + | | · | x4 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'16(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'111(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'110(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'18(x1, ..., x3) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'15(x1, x2) ) = | 1 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'13(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'14(x1, ..., x4) ) = | 1 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 | + | | · | x4 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'17(x1, x2) ) = | 1 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
Matrix type:
We used a basic matrix type which is not further parametrizeable.
As matrix orders are CE-compatible, we used usable rules w.r.t. argument filtering in the order.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:
none
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
new_gcd0Gcd'17(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'15(vuz165, vuz166)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [3]:
Non-tuple symbols:
M( new_primMinusNatS0(x1, x2) ) = | | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
Tuple symbols:
M( new_gcd0Gcd'19(x1, ..., x4) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 | + | | · | x4 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'16(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'111(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'110(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'18(x1, ..., x3) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'15(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'13(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'14(x1, ..., x4) ) = | 1 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 | + | | · | x4 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'17(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
Matrix type:
We used a basic matrix type which is not further parametrizeable.
As matrix orders are CE-compatible, we used usable rules w.r.t. argument filtering in the order.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'15(x0, Succ(x1)) → new_gcd0Gcd'17(new_primMinusNatS0(x0, x1), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz18900, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz203, vuz204)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
Used ordering: Matrix interpretation [3]:
Non-tuple symbols:
M( new_primMinusNatS0(x1, x2) ) = | | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
Tuple symbols:
M( new_gcd0Gcd'19(x1, ..., x4) ) = | 1 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 | + | | · | x4 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'16(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'111(x1, x2) ) = | 1 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'18(x1, ..., x3) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'110(x1, x2) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'13(x1, x2) ) = | 1 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 |
M( new_gcd0Gcd'14(x1, ..., x4) ) = | 0 | + | | · | x1 | + | | · | x2 | + | | · | x3 | + | | · | x4 |
Matrix type:
We used a basic matrix type which is not further parametrizeable.
As matrix orders are CE-compatible, we used usable rules w.r.t. argument filtering in the order.
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'110(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By instantiating [15] the rule new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870) we obtained the following new rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1), Succ(Succ(x0))) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(x0, Succ(x1), x0, x1)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ NonInfProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1), Succ(Succ(x0))) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(x0, Succ(x1), x0, x1)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The DP Problem is simplified using the Induction Calculus [18] with the following steps:
Note that final constraints are written in bold face.
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060), new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204) which results in the following constraint:
(1) (new_gcd0Gcd'19(x3, x4, x5, x6)=new_gcd0Gcd'19(x7, x8, Zero, Succ(x9)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'19(x7, x8, Zero, Succ(x9))≥new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(x7), x8))
We simplified constraint (1) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(2) (new_gcd0Gcd'19(x3, x4, Zero, Succ(x9))≥new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(x3), x4))
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1), Succ(Succ(x0))) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(x0, Succ(x1), x0, x1), new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204) which results in the following constraint:
(3) (new_gcd0Gcd'19(x23, Succ(x24), x23, x24)=new_gcd0Gcd'19(x25, x26, Zero, Succ(x27)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'19(x25, x26, Zero, Succ(x27))≥new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(x25), x26))
We simplified constraint (3) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(4) (new_gcd0Gcd'19(Zero, Succ(Succ(x27)), Zero, Succ(x27))≥new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(Zero), Succ(Succ(x27))))
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060), new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060) which results in the following constraint:
(5) (new_gcd0Gcd'19(x31, x32, x33, x34)=new_gcd0Gcd'19(x35, x36, Succ(x37), Succ(x38)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'19(x35, x36, Succ(x37), Succ(x38))≥new_gcd0Gcd'19(x35, x36, x37, x38))
We simplified constraint (5) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(6) (new_gcd0Gcd'19(x31, x32, Succ(x37), Succ(x38))≥new_gcd0Gcd'19(x31, x32, x37, x38))
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1), Succ(Succ(x0))) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(x0, Succ(x1), x0, x1), new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060) which results in the following constraint:
(7) (new_gcd0Gcd'19(x52, Succ(x53), x52, x53)=new_gcd0Gcd'19(x54, x55, Succ(x56), Succ(x57)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'19(x54, x55, Succ(x56), Succ(x57))≥new_gcd0Gcd'19(x54, x55, x56, x57))
We simplified constraint (7) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(8) (new_gcd0Gcd'19(Succ(x56), Succ(Succ(x57)), Succ(x56), Succ(x57))≥new_gcd0Gcd'19(Succ(x56), Succ(Succ(x57)), x56, x57))
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680), new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680) which results in the following constraint:
(9) (new_gcd0Gcd'14(x65, x66, x67, x68)=new_gcd0Gcd'14(x69, x70, Succ(x71), Succ(x72)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'14(x69, x70, Succ(x71), Succ(x72))≥new_gcd0Gcd'14(x69, x70, x71, x72))
We simplified constraint (9) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(10) (new_gcd0Gcd'14(x65, x66, Succ(x71), Succ(x72))≥new_gcd0Gcd'14(x65, x66, x71, x72))
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200), new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680) which results in the following constraint:
(11) (new_gcd0Gcd'14(x75, Succ(x76), x75, x76)=new_gcd0Gcd'14(x77, x78, Succ(x79), Succ(x80)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'14(x77, x78, Succ(x79), Succ(x80))≥new_gcd0Gcd'14(x77, x78, x79, x80))
We simplified constraint (11) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(12) (new_gcd0Gcd'14(Succ(x79), Succ(Succ(x80)), Succ(x79), Succ(x80))≥new_gcd0Gcd'14(Succ(x79), Succ(Succ(x80)), x79, x80))
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155)) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166), new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155)) which results in the following constraint:
(13) (new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(x105), x106)=new_gcd0Gcd'16(x108, x109) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'16(x108, x109)≥new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(x109), x108, Succ(x109)))
We simplified constraint (13) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(14) (new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(x105), x106)≥new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(x106), Succ(x105), Succ(x106)))
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0)), new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200) which results in the following constraint:
(15) (new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(x128)), Succ(x127))=new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(x129))), Succ(x130)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(x129))), Succ(x130))≥new_gcd0Gcd'14(x129, Succ(x130), x129, x130))
We simplified constraint (15) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(16) (new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(x129))), Succ(x127))≥new_gcd0Gcd'14(x129, Succ(x127), x129, x127))
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0)) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204), new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0)) which results in the following constraint:
(17) (new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(x136), x137)=new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(x139), x140) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(x139), x140)≥new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(x140)), Succ(x139)))
We simplified constraint (17) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(18) (new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(x136), x137)≥new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(x137)), Succ(x136)))
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680), new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166) which results in the following constraint:
(19) (new_gcd0Gcd'14(x167, x168, x169, x170)=new_gcd0Gcd'14(x171, x172, Zero, Succ(x173)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'14(x171, x172, Zero, Succ(x173))≥new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(x171), x172))
We simplified constraint (19) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(20) (new_gcd0Gcd'14(x167, x168, Zero, Succ(x173))≥new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(x167), x168))
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200), new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166) which results in the following constraint:
(21) (new_gcd0Gcd'14(x176, Succ(x177), x176, x177)=new_gcd0Gcd'14(x178, x179, Zero, Succ(x180)) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'14(x178, x179, Zero, Succ(x180))≥new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(x178), x179))
We simplified constraint (21) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(22) (new_gcd0Gcd'14(Zero, Succ(Succ(x180)), Zero, Succ(x180))≥new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(Zero), Succ(Succ(x180))))
For Pair new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1), Succ(Succ(x0))) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(x0, Succ(x1), x0, x1) the following chains were created:
- We consider the chain new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155)), new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1), Succ(Succ(x0))) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(x0, Succ(x1), x0, x1) which results in the following constraint:
(23) (new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(x200), x199, Succ(x200))=new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x201)), Succ(x202), Succ(Succ(x201))) ⇒ new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x201)), Succ(x202), Succ(Succ(x201)))≥new_gcd0Gcd'19(x201, Succ(x202), x201, x202))
We simplified constraint (23) using rules (I), (II), (III) which results in the following new constraint:
(24) (new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x201)), Succ(x202), Succ(Succ(x201)))≥new_gcd0Gcd'19(x201, Succ(x202), x201, x202))
To summarize, we get the following constraints P≥ for the following pairs.
- new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
- (new_gcd0Gcd'19(x3, x4, Zero, Succ(x9))≥new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(x3), x4))
- (new_gcd0Gcd'19(Zero, Succ(Succ(x27)), Zero, Succ(x27))≥new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(Zero), Succ(Succ(x27))))
- new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
- (new_gcd0Gcd'19(x31, x32, Succ(x37), Succ(x38))≥new_gcd0Gcd'19(x31, x32, x37, x38))
- (new_gcd0Gcd'19(Succ(x56), Succ(Succ(x57)), Succ(x56), Succ(x57))≥new_gcd0Gcd'19(Succ(x56), Succ(Succ(x57)), x56, x57))
- new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
- (new_gcd0Gcd'14(x65, x66, Succ(x71), Succ(x72))≥new_gcd0Gcd'14(x65, x66, x71, x72))
- (new_gcd0Gcd'14(Succ(x79), Succ(Succ(x80)), Succ(x79), Succ(x80))≥new_gcd0Gcd'14(Succ(x79), Succ(Succ(x80)), x79, x80))
- new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
- (new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(x105), x106)≥new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(x106), Succ(x105), Succ(x106)))
- new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
- (new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(x129))), Succ(x127))≥new_gcd0Gcd'14(x129, Succ(x127), x129, x127))
- new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
- (new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(x136), x137)≥new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(x137)), Succ(x136)))
- new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
- (new_gcd0Gcd'14(x167, x168, Zero, Succ(x173))≥new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(x167), x168))
- (new_gcd0Gcd'14(Zero, Succ(Succ(x180)), Zero, Succ(x180))≥new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(Zero), Succ(Succ(x180))))
- new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1), Succ(Succ(x0))) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(x0, Succ(x1), x0, x1)
- (new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x201)), Succ(x202), Succ(Succ(x201)))≥new_gcd0Gcd'19(x201, Succ(x202), x201, x202))
The constraints for P> respective Pbound are constructed from P≥ where we just replace every occurence of "t ≥ s" in P≥ by "t > s" respective "t ≥ c". Here c stands for the fresh constant used for Pbound.
Using the following integer polynomial ordering the resulting constraints can be solved
Polynomial interpretation [18]:
POL(Neg(x1)) = x1
POL(Succ(x1)) = 1 + x1
POL(Zero) = 0
POL(c) = -1
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'111(x1, x2)) = -1 + x1
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'13(x1, x2)) = -1 + x2
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'14(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = x1 - x3 + x4
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'16(x1, x2)) = -1 + x1
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'18(x1, x2, x3)) = -1 + x1 + x2 - x3
POL(new_gcd0Gcd'19(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = x1 - x3 + x4
The following pairs are in P>:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
The following pairs are in Pbound:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'16(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1), Succ(Succ(x0))) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(x0, Succ(x1), x0, x1)
There are no usable rules
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ NonInfProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'111(Succ(z0), z1) → new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(z1)), Succ(z0))
new_gcd0Gcd'13(Neg(Succ(Succ(vuz132000))), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_gcd0Gcd'16(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_gcd0Gcd'18(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1), Succ(Succ(x0))) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(x0, Succ(x1), x0, x1)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs with 4 less nodes.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ NonInfProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'14(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3, 4 > 4
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrowing
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ Instantiation
↳ QDP
↳ NonInfProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'19(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3, 4 > 4
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd2(Succ(vuz1250), Succ(vuz1290), vuz27) → new_gcd2(vuz1250, vuz1290, vuz27)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_gcd2(Succ(vuz1250), Succ(vuz1290), vuz27) → new_gcd2(vuz1250, vuz1290, vuz27)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_gcd20(Succ(vuz1230), Succ(vuz1160), vuz42) → new_gcd20(vuz1230, vuz1160, vuz42)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_gcd20(Succ(vuz1230), Succ(vuz1160), vuz42) → new_gcd20(vuz1230, vuz1160, vuz42)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(vuz410), vuz8) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz410, vuz8)
new_primDivNatS0(Succ(vuz850), Succ(vuz86000)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz850, vuz86000, vuz850, vuz86000)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
new_primDivNatS(Succ(vuz850), Succ(vuz86000)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz850, vuz86000, vuz850, vuz86000)
new_primDivNatS0(Succ(vuz850), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(vuz850, Zero)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Zero) → new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110))
new_primDivNatS01(vuz109, vuz110) → new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110))
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS01(vuz109, vuz110)
new_primDivNatS(Succ(vuz850), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(vuz850, Zero)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 2 SCCs with 2 less nodes.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS(Succ(vuz850), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(vuz850, Zero)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS(Succ(vuz850), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(vuz850, Zero)
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS(Succ(vuz850), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(vuz850, Zero)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primDivNatS(Succ(vuz850), Zero) → new_primDivNatS(vuz850, Zero)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(vuz410), vuz8) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz410, vuz8)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
new_primDivNatS0(Succ(vuz850), Succ(vuz86000)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz850, vuz86000, vuz850, vuz86000)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Zero) → new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110))
new_primDivNatS01(vuz109, vuz110) → new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110))
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS01(vuz109, vuz110)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [15].
The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.
new_primDivNatS0(Succ(vuz850), Succ(vuz86000)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz850, vuz86000, vuz850, vuz86000)
The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(vuz410), vuz8) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz410, vuz8)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Zero) → new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110))
new_primDivNatS01(vuz109, vuz110) → new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110))
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS01(vuz109, vuz110)
Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [25]:
POL(Succ(x1)) = 1 + x1
POL(Zero) = 0
POL(new_primDivNatS0(x1, x2)) = 1 + x1
POL(new_primDivNatS00(x1, x2, x3, x4)) = x1
POL(new_primDivNatS01(x1, x2)) = x1
POL(new_primDivNatS1(x1, x2)) = x1
POL(new_primMinusNatS0(x1, x2)) = x1
The following usable rules [17] were oriented:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS1(Succ(vuz410), vuz8) → new_primDivNatS0(vuz410, vuz8)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Zero) → new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110))
new_primDivNatS01(vuz109, vuz110) → new_primDivNatS1(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110))
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS01(vuz109, vuz110)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [15,17,22] contains 1 SCC with 4 less nodes.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [15] we can delete all non-usable rules [17] from R.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPOrderProof
↳ QDP
↳ DependencyGraphProof
↳ QDP
↳ UsableRulesProof
↳ QDP
↳ QReductionProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS00(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
The graph contains the following edges 1 >= 1, 2 >= 2, 3 > 3, 4 > 4
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primQuotInt(Succ(vuz6500), Succ(vuz150), vuz27) → new_primQuotInt(vuz6500, vuz150, vuz27)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primQuotInt(Succ(vuz6500), Succ(vuz150), vuz27) → new_primQuotInt(vuz6500, vuz150, vuz27)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDPSizeChangeProof
↳ QDP
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_primQuotInt0(Succ(vuz80), Succ(vuz7100), vuz42) → new_primQuotInt0(vuz80, vuz7100, vuz42)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [20] together with the size-change analysis [32] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem. From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- new_primQuotInt0(Succ(vuz80), Succ(vuz7100), vuz42) → new_primQuotInt0(vuz80, vuz7100, vuz42)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2, 3 >= 3
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ MNOCProof
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_numericEnumFrom(vuz3) → new_numericEnumFrom(new_ps(vuz3))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_gcd217(vuz127, vuz131, vuz126, vuz130, vuz27) → new_gcd22(new_primPlusNat0(vuz127, vuz131), vuz27)
new_primPlusNat2(Zero) → Zero
new_gcd26(Succ(vuz1230), Zero, vuz42) → new_gcd27(Succ(vuz1230), vuz42)
new_primQuotInt3(Zero, Succ(vuz7100), vuz42) → new_primQuotInt7(Succ(vuz7100), new_gcd21(vuz7100, vuz42))
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primQuotInt9(vuz67, vuz15, vuz68, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt7(new_primPlusNat0(vuz67, new_primMulNat0(vuz15)), new_reduce2D0(new_primPlusNat0(vuz67, new_primMulNat0(vuz15)), vuz27))
new_gcd22(Succ(vuz1180), Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'116(vuz270, vuz1180)
new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz151, vuz152) → new_gcd0Gcd'124(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz151), vuz152), vuz152)
new_gcd0Gcd'117(Neg(vuz1320), vuz420) → new_gcd0Gcd'124(vuz1320, vuz420)
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Neg(Zero))) → new_error0
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'124(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Neg(Zero)) → new_error
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Zero, vuz420) → Pos(Succ(vuz420))
new_gcd21(vuz7100, Succ(vuz420)) → new_gcd0Gcd'116(vuz420, vuz7100)
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd27(Zero, Succ(vuz420)) → new_gcd0Gcd'125(vuz420)
new_gcd0Gcd'115(vuz200, vuz201) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Neg(Succ(vuz201)), vuz200)
new_gcd213(vuz127, vuz15, vuz126, vuz27) → new_gcd217(vuz127, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz126, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz27)
new_primDivNatS02(Zero, Succ(vuz86000)) → Zero
new_gcd27(Succ(vuz1070), Succ(vuz420)) → new_gcd0Gcd'121(vuz420, vuz1070)
new_gcd0Gcd'121(vuz420, vuz1070) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(new_abs0(vuz1070), vuz420)
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Zero), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'112(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero, new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero))
new_primQuotInt5(vuz69, vuz8, vuz70, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(new_primPlusNat0(vuz69, new_primMulNat0(vuz8)), new_reduce2D(new_primPlusNat0(vuz69, new_primMulNat0(vuz8)), vuz42))
new_abs0(vuz6500) → Pos(Succ(vuz6500))
new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz148, vuz149) → new_gcd0Gcd'122(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz148), vuz149), vuz149)
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Pos(Zero))) → new_error0
new_gcd22(Zero, Zero) → new_error
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
new_primQuotInt4(Neg(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt2(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_gcd25(vuz6500, Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'121(vuz270, vuz6500)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_primQuotInt3(Succ(vuz80), Zero, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(Succ(vuz80), new_reduce2D(Succ(vuz80), vuz42))
new_error0 → error([])
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'126(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_reduce2Reduce10(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27, vuz26, Zero) → new_error0
new_gcd216(Zero, Zero, vuz27) → new_gcd214(vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'112(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_primMulNat0(vuz8) → new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Succ(vuz8))
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz160, vuz161)
new_reduce2Reduce1(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42, vuz41, Succ(vuz430)) → :%(new_primQuotInt4(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42), new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, new_gcd210(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42)))
new_abs(vuz1180) → Pos(Succ(vuz1180))
new_reduce2D(vuz107, vuz42) → new_gcd27(vuz107, vuz42)
new_primQuotInt2(Succ(vuz710), vuz8, vuz72, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt3(vuz8, vuz710, vuz42)
new_gcd26(Zero, Succ(vuz1160), vuz42) → new_gcd21(vuz1160, vuz42)
new_gcd211(Neg(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_gcd213(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_gcd211(Pos(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_gcd212(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'120(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd28(vuz114, vuz8, vuz113, vuz42) → new_gcd29(vuz114, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz113, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'126(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Zero, Succ(vuz1120)) → Zero
new_gcd215(vuz125, vuz129, vuz124, vuz128, vuz27) → new_gcd216(vuz125, vuz129, vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'122(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz132000, Zero)
new_primQuotInt2(Zero, vuz8, vuz72, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(Succ(vuz8), new_reduce2D(Succ(vuz8), vuz42))
new_gcd21(vuz7100, Zero) → new_abs(vuz7100)
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Pos(Succ(vuz11700))) → Neg(new_primDivNatS2(vuz26, vuz11700))
new_gcd27(Succ(vuz1070), Zero) → new_abs0(vuz1070)
new_primDivNatS02(Zero, Zero) → Succ(Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Zero, vuz420) → Pos(Succ(vuz420))
new_gcd216(Zero, Succ(vuz1290), vuz27) → new_gcd22(Succ(vuz1290), vuz27)
new_gcd26(Zero, Zero, vuz42) → new_gcd27(Zero, vuz42)
new_primPlusNat2(Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(vuz1900)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz18900, Zero)
new_primPlusNat1(Zero) → Succ(Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'115(Zero, Succ(vuz1870))
new_gcd210(Pos(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_gcd28(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'120(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_primQuotInt6(Neg(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt9(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_primMulNat1(Zero) → Zero
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Pos(Zero)) → new_error
new_primDivNatS02(Succ(vuz850), Succ(vuz86000)) → new_primDivNatS03(vuz850, vuz86000, vuz850, vuz86000)
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(vuz6700), Succ(vuz150)) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat0(vuz6700, vuz150)))
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'116(vuz420, vuz7100) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(new_abs(vuz7100), vuz420)
new_primQuotInt3(Succ(vuz80), Succ(vuz7100), vuz42) → new_primQuotInt3(vuz80, vuz7100, vuz42)
new_gcd22(Zero, Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Neg(Zero), vuz270)
new_primDivNatS02(Succ(vuz850), Zero) → Succ(new_primDivNatS3(vuz850, Zero))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_gcd214(Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'125(vuz270)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primDivNatS2(Zero, vuz8) → Zero
new_primQuotInt10(Zero, Zero, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt1(Zero, new_gcd214(vuz27))
new_gcd212(vuz125, vuz15, vuz124, vuz27) → new_gcd215(vuz125, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz124, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz27)
new_gcd27(Zero, Zero) → new_error
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Pos(Zero)) → new_error
new_gcd210(Neg(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_gcd23(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Neg(Succ(vuz11700))) → Pos(new_primDivNatS2(vuz26, vuz11700))
new_reduce2Reduce1(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42, vuz41, Zero) → new_error0
new_gcd26(Succ(vuz1230), Succ(vuz1160), vuz42) → new_gcd26(vuz1230, vuz1160, vuz42)
new_primQuotInt10(Succ(vuz6500), Zero, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt1(Succ(vuz6500), new_gcd25(vuz6500, vuz27))
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(vuz190)) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat2(vuz190)))
new_primQuotInt8(Succ(vuz650), vuz15, vuz66, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt10(vuz650, vuz15, vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd216(Succ(vuz1250), Zero, vuz27) → new_gcd25(vuz1250, vuz27)
new_gcd24(vuz116, vuz123, vuz115, vuz122, vuz42) → new_gcd26(vuz123, vuz116, vuz42)
new_primMulNat1(Succ(vuz31000)) → new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz31000))
new_primQuotInt3(Zero, Zero, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(Zero, new_reduce2D(Zero, vuz42))
new_primDivNatS3(vuz85, vuz8600) → new_primDivNatS02(vuz85, vuz8600)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz203, vuz204)
new_reduce2Reduce10(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27, vuz26, Succ(vuz280)) → :%(new_primQuotInt6(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27), new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, new_gcd211(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27)))
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Neg(Succ(vuz3100)))) → new_reduce2Reduce10(vuz30, vuz3100, new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)))
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Neg(Succ(vuz10600))) → Neg(new_primDivNatS2(vuz41, vuz10600))
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Neg(Zero)) → new_error
new_primQuotInt6(Pos(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt8(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'125(vuz420) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Pos(Zero), vuz420)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_error → error([])
new_primDivNatS2(Succ(vuz410), vuz8) → new_primDivNatS02(vuz410, vuz8)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz203, vuz204)
new_primQuotInt10(Zero, Succ(vuz150), vuz27) → new_primQuotInt7(Succ(vuz150), new_reduce2D0(Succ(vuz150), vuz27))
new_gcd29(vuz114, vuz121, vuz113, vuz120, vuz42) → new_gcd27(new_primPlusNat0(vuz114, vuz121), vuz42)
new_gcd22(Succ(vuz1180), Zero) → new_abs(vuz1180)
new_primDivNatS04(vuz109, vuz110) → Succ(new_primDivNatS2(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110)))
new_gcd25(vuz6500, Zero) → new_abs0(vuz6500)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Zero, vuz187, vuz188) → Neg(Succ(vuz187))
new_gcd0Gcd'126(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_primQuotInt4(Pos(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt5(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'115(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_primQuotInt10(Succ(vuz6500), Succ(vuz150), vuz27) → new_primQuotInt10(vuz6500, vuz150, vuz27)
new_primQuotInt8(Zero, vuz15, vuz66, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt7(Succ(vuz15), new_reduce2D0(Succ(vuz15), vuz27))
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Pos(Succ(vuz10600))) → Pos(new_primDivNatS2(vuz41, vuz10600))
new_gcd0Gcd'117(Pos(vuz1320), vuz420) → new_gcd0Gcd'122(vuz1320, vuz420)
new_gcd214(Zero) → new_error
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS04(vuz109, vuz110)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Succ(vuz150)) → Succ(vuz150)
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(vuz6700), Zero) → Succ(vuz6700)
new_gcd23(vuz116, vuz8, vuz115, vuz42) → new_gcd24(vuz116, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz115, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'120(vuz157, vuz158) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Pos(Succ(vuz158)), vuz157)
new_reduce2D0(vuz118, vuz27) → new_gcd22(vuz118, vuz27)
new_gcd216(Succ(vuz1250), Succ(vuz1290), vuz27) → new_gcd216(vuz1250, vuz1290, vuz27)
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Zero) → new_primDivNatS04(vuz109, vuz110)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Pos(Succ(vuz3100)))) → new_reduce2Reduce1(vuz30, vuz3100, new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)))
The set Q consists of the following terms:
new_gcd0Gcd'117(Neg(x0), x1)
new_primQuotInt4(Neg(x0), x1, x2)
new_gcd22(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_primQuotInt1(x0, Neg(Succ(x1)))
new_primQuotInt8(Zero, x0, x1, x2)
new_primQuotInt10(Zero, Succ(x0), x1)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_gcd0Gcd'113(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'123(x0, x1)
new_primQuotInt6(Neg(x0), x1, x2)
new_gcd27(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_gcd216(Succ(x0), Zero, x1)
new_primQuotInt1(x0, Neg(Zero))
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Zero, x0)
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_error
new_primPlusNat2(Zero)
new_primQuotInt3(Succ(x0), Succ(x1), x2)
new_primDivNatS03(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primQuotInt5(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_gcd26(Zero, Succ(x0), x1)
new_primQuotInt10(Zero, Zero, x0)
new_gcd21(x0, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Zero, x0, x1)
new_gcd0Gcd'126(x0, x1)
new_gcd29(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
new_gcd22(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_abs0(x0)
new_gcd22(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Zero), Zero, x0)
new_gcd216(Succ(x0), Succ(x1), x2)
new_ps(:%(x0, Neg(Zero)))
new_gcd0Gcd'116(x0, x1)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1), x2)
new_gcd0Gcd'117(Pos(x0), x1)
new_primQuotInt3(Succ(x0), Zero, x1)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_gcd27(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_gcd0Gcd'121(x0, x1)
new_gcd23(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_reduce2Reduce1(x0, x1, x2, x3, Succ(x4))
new_primPlusNat1(Zero)
new_primDivNatS02(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_reduce2D0(x0, x1)
new_gcd0Gcd'118(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primDivNatS03(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_reduce2Reduce1(x0, x1, x2, x3, Zero)
new_gcd213(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero)
new_gcd210(Neg(x0), x1, x2)
new_gcd0Gcd'127(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0), x1)
new_gcd217(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
new_gcd0Gcd'127(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_gcd26(Zero, Zero, x0)
new_primQuotInt1(x0, Pos(Succ(x1)))
new_ps(:%(x0, Pos(Succ(x1))))
new_gcd0Gcd'120(x0, x1)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Zero, x0)
new_ps(:%(x0, Neg(Succ(x1))))
new_primQuotInt6(Pos(x0), x1, x2)
new_gcd24(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
new_gcd26(Succ(x0), Succ(x1), x2)
new_gcd210(Pos(x0), x1, x2)
new_gcd28(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_primQuotInt4(Pos(x0), x1, x2)
new_primQuotInt8(Succ(x0), x1, x2, x3)
new_primDivNatS03(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primQuotInt2(Zero, x0, x1, x2)
new_primMulNat1(Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero)
new_primQuotInt7(x0, Pos(Succ(x1)))
new_gcd216(Zero, Zero, x0)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Succ(x0)), Zero, x1)
new_gcd26(Succ(x0), Zero, x1)
new_reduce2Reduce10(x0, x1, x2, x3, Zero)
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(x0))
new_reduce2D(x0, x1)
new_primDivNatS04(x0, x1)
new_gcd0Gcd'125(x0)
new_gcd27(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_error0
new_primPlusNat2(Succ(x0))
new_primQuotInt1(x0, Pos(Zero))
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_reduce2Reduce10(x0, x1, x2, x3, Succ(x4))
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_gcd27(Zero, Zero)
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'119(x0, x1)
new_primQuotInt3(Zero, Succ(x0), x1)
new_gcd21(x0, Succ(x1))
new_primMulNat1(Succ(x0))
new_primQuotInt7(x0, Neg(Succ(x1)))
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Zero), Succ(x0))
new_primQuotInt2(Succ(x0), x1, x2, x3)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_gcd0Gcd'113(x0, x1, Zero, Zero)
new_primMulNat0(x0)
new_gcd214(Zero)
new_primQuotInt10(Succ(x0), Succ(x1), x2)
new_primQuotInt7(x0, Neg(Zero))
new_primQuotInt3(Zero, Zero, x0)
new_ps(:%(x0, Pos(Zero)))
new_gcd211(Neg(x0), x1, x2)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Zero)
new_primDivNatS02(Zero, Zero)
new_primQuotInt10(Succ(x0), Zero, x1)
new_gcd0Gcd'114(x0, x1)
new_gcd216(Zero, Succ(x0), x1)
new_primDivNatS2(Succ(x0), x1)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_gcd0Gcd'118(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_abs(x0)
new_primQuotInt9(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_gcd0Gcd'127(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_gcd0Gcd'118(x0, x1, Zero, Succ(x2))
new_gcd0Gcd'127(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_primDivNatS03(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'115(x0, x1)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Succ(x0)), Succ(x1))
new_gcd25(x0, Succ(x1))
new_gcd22(Zero, Zero)
new_gcd212(x0, x1, x2, x3)
new_primDivNatS02(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(x0), Succ(x1))
new_primQuotInt7(x0, Pos(Zero))
new_primDivNatS02(Zero, Succ(x0))
new_gcd0Gcd'118(x0, x1, Succ(x2), Succ(x3))
new_gcd215(x0, x1, x2, x3, x4)
new_gcd211(Pos(x0), x1, x2)
new_gcd214(Succ(x0))
new_primDivNatS2(Zero, x0)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Zero), Zero)
new_gcd25(x0, Zero)
new_primDivNatS3(x0, x1)
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the modular non-overlap check [17] to decrease Q to the empty set.
↳ HASKELL
↳ IFR
↳ HASKELL
↳ BR
↳ HASKELL
↳ COR
↳ HASKELL
↳ LetRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ NumRed
↳ HASKELL
↳ Narrow
↳ AND
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ QDP
↳ MNOCProof
↳ QDP
↳ NonTerminationProof
↳ Narrow
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_numericEnumFrom(vuz3) → new_numericEnumFrom(new_ps(vuz3))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_gcd217(vuz127, vuz131, vuz126, vuz130, vuz27) → new_gcd22(new_primPlusNat0(vuz127, vuz131), vuz27)
new_primPlusNat2(Zero) → Zero
new_gcd26(Succ(vuz1230), Zero, vuz42) → new_gcd27(Succ(vuz1230), vuz42)
new_primQuotInt3(Zero, Succ(vuz7100), vuz42) → new_primQuotInt7(Succ(vuz7100), new_gcd21(vuz7100, vuz42))
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primQuotInt9(vuz67, vuz15, vuz68, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt7(new_primPlusNat0(vuz67, new_primMulNat0(vuz15)), new_reduce2D0(new_primPlusNat0(vuz67, new_primMulNat0(vuz15)), vuz27))
new_gcd22(Succ(vuz1180), Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'116(vuz270, vuz1180)
new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz151, vuz152) → new_gcd0Gcd'124(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz151), vuz152), vuz152)
new_gcd0Gcd'117(Neg(vuz1320), vuz420) → new_gcd0Gcd'124(vuz1320, vuz420)
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Neg(Zero))) → new_error0
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'124(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Neg(Zero)) → new_error
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Zero, vuz420) → Pos(Succ(vuz420))
new_gcd21(vuz7100, Succ(vuz420)) → new_gcd0Gcd'116(vuz420, vuz7100)
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd27(Zero, Succ(vuz420)) → new_gcd0Gcd'125(vuz420)
new_gcd0Gcd'115(vuz200, vuz201) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Neg(Succ(vuz201)), vuz200)
new_gcd213(vuz127, vuz15, vuz126, vuz27) → new_gcd217(vuz127, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz126, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz27)
new_primDivNatS02(Zero, Succ(vuz86000)) → Zero
new_gcd27(Succ(vuz1070), Succ(vuz420)) → new_gcd0Gcd'121(vuz420, vuz1070)
new_gcd0Gcd'121(vuz420, vuz1070) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(new_abs0(vuz1070), vuz420)
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Zero), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'112(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero, new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero))
new_primQuotInt5(vuz69, vuz8, vuz70, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(new_primPlusNat0(vuz69, new_primMulNat0(vuz8)), new_reduce2D(new_primPlusNat0(vuz69, new_primMulNat0(vuz8)), vuz42))
new_abs0(vuz6500) → Pos(Succ(vuz6500))
new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz148, vuz149) → new_gcd0Gcd'122(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz148), vuz149), vuz149)
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Pos(Zero))) → new_error0
new_gcd22(Zero, Zero) → new_error
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
new_primQuotInt4(Neg(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt2(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_gcd25(vuz6500, Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'121(vuz270, vuz6500)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_primQuotInt3(Succ(vuz80), Zero, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(Succ(vuz80), new_reduce2D(Succ(vuz80), vuz42))
new_error0 → error([])
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'126(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_reduce2Reduce10(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27, vuz26, Zero) → new_error0
new_gcd216(Zero, Zero, vuz27) → new_gcd214(vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'112(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_primMulNat0(vuz8) → new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Succ(vuz8))
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz160, vuz161)
new_reduce2Reduce1(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42, vuz41, Succ(vuz430)) → :%(new_primQuotInt4(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42), new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, new_gcd210(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42)))
new_abs(vuz1180) → Pos(Succ(vuz1180))
new_reduce2D(vuz107, vuz42) → new_gcd27(vuz107, vuz42)
new_primQuotInt2(Succ(vuz710), vuz8, vuz72, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt3(vuz8, vuz710, vuz42)
new_gcd26(Zero, Succ(vuz1160), vuz42) → new_gcd21(vuz1160, vuz42)
new_gcd211(Neg(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_gcd213(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_gcd211(Pos(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_gcd212(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'120(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd28(vuz114, vuz8, vuz113, vuz42) → new_gcd29(vuz114, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz113, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'126(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Zero, Succ(vuz1120)) → Zero
new_gcd215(vuz125, vuz129, vuz124, vuz128, vuz27) → new_gcd216(vuz125, vuz129, vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'122(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz132000, Zero)
new_primQuotInt2(Zero, vuz8, vuz72, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(Succ(vuz8), new_reduce2D(Succ(vuz8), vuz42))
new_gcd21(vuz7100, Zero) → new_abs(vuz7100)
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Pos(Succ(vuz11700))) → Neg(new_primDivNatS2(vuz26, vuz11700))
new_gcd27(Succ(vuz1070), Zero) → new_abs0(vuz1070)
new_primDivNatS02(Zero, Zero) → Succ(Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Zero, vuz420) → Pos(Succ(vuz420))
new_gcd216(Zero, Succ(vuz1290), vuz27) → new_gcd22(Succ(vuz1290), vuz27)
new_gcd26(Zero, Zero, vuz42) → new_gcd27(Zero, vuz42)
new_primPlusNat2(Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(vuz1900)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz18900, Zero)
new_primPlusNat1(Zero) → Succ(Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'115(Zero, Succ(vuz1870))
new_gcd210(Pos(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_gcd28(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'120(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_primQuotInt6(Neg(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt9(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_primMulNat1(Zero) → Zero
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Pos(Zero)) → new_error
new_primDivNatS02(Succ(vuz850), Succ(vuz86000)) → new_primDivNatS03(vuz850, vuz86000, vuz850, vuz86000)
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(vuz6700), Succ(vuz150)) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat0(vuz6700, vuz150)))
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'116(vuz420, vuz7100) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(new_abs(vuz7100), vuz420)
new_primQuotInt3(Succ(vuz80), Succ(vuz7100), vuz42) → new_primQuotInt3(vuz80, vuz7100, vuz42)
new_gcd22(Zero, Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Neg(Zero), vuz270)
new_primDivNatS02(Succ(vuz850), Zero) → Succ(new_primDivNatS3(vuz850, Zero))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_gcd214(Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'125(vuz270)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primDivNatS2(Zero, vuz8) → Zero
new_primQuotInt10(Zero, Zero, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt1(Zero, new_gcd214(vuz27))
new_gcd212(vuz125, vuz15, vuz124, vuz27) → new_gcd215(vuz125, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz124, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz27)
new_gcd27(Zero, Zero) → new_error
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Pos(Zero)) → new_error
new_gcd210(Neg(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_gcd23(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Neg(Succ(vuz11700))) → Pos(new_primDivNatS2(vuz26, vuz11700))
new_reduce2Reduce1(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42, vuz41, Zero) → new_error0
new_gcd26(Succ(vuz1230), Succ(vuz1160), vuz42) → new_gcd26(vuz1230, vuz1160, vuz42)
new_primQuotInt10(Succ(vuz6500), Zero, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt1(Succ(vuz6500), new_gcd25(vuz6500, vuz27))
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(vuz190)) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat2(vuz190)))
new_primQuotInt8(Succ(vuz650), vuz15, vuz66, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt10(vuz650, vuz15, vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd216(Succ(vuz1250), Zero, vuz27) → new_gcd25(vuz1250, vuz27)
new_gcd24(vuz116, vuz123, vuz115, vuz122, vuz42) → new_gcd26(vuz123, vuz116, vuz42)
new_primMulNat1(Succ(vuz31000)) → new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz31000))
new_primQuotInt3(Zero, Zero, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(Zero, new_reduce2D(Zero, vuz42))
new_primDivNatS3(vuz85, vuz8600) → new_primDivNatS02(vuz85, vuz8600)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz203, vuz204)
new_reduce2Reduce10(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27, vuz26, Succ(vuz280)) → :%(new_primQuotInt6(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27), new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, new_gcd211(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27)))
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Neg(Succ(vuz3100)))) → new_reduce2Reduce10(vuz30, vuz3100, new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)))
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Neg(Succ(vuz10600))) → Neg(new_primDivNatS2(vuz41, vuz10600))
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Neg(Zero)) → new_error
new_primQuotInt6(Pos(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt8(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'125(vuz420) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Pos(Zero), vuz420)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_error → error([])
new_primDivNatS2(Succ(vuz410), vuz8) → new_primDivNatS02(vuz410, vuz8)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz203, vuz204)
new_primQuotInt10(Zero, Succ(vuz150), vuz27) → new_primQuotInt7(Succ(vuz150), new_reduce2D0(Succ(vuz150), vuz27))
new_gcd29(vuz114, vuz121, vuz113, vuz120, vuz42) → new_gcd27(new_primPlusNat0(vuz114, vuz121), vuz42)
new_gcd22(Succ(vuz1180), Zero) → new_abs(vuz1180)
new_primDivNatS04(vuz109, vuz110) → Succ(new_primDivNatS2(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110)))
new_gcd25(vuz6500, Zero) → new_abs0(vuz6500)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Zero, vuz187, vuz188) → Neg(Succ(vuz187))
new_gcd0Gcd'126(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_primQuotInt4(Pos(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt5(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'115(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_primQuotInt10(Succ(vuz6500), Succ(vuz150), vuz27) → new_primQuotInt10(vuz6500, vuz150, vuz27)
new_primQuotInt8(Zero, vuz15, vuz66, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt7(Succ(vuz15), new_reduce2D0(Succ(vuz15), vuz27))
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Pos(Succ(vuz10600))) → Pos(new_primDivNatS2(vuz41, vuz10600))
new_gcd0Gcd'117(Pos(vuz1320), vuz420) → new_gcd0Gcd'122(vuz1320, vuz420)
new_gcd214(Zero) → new_error
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS04(vuz109, vuz110)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Succ(vuz150)) → Succ(vuz150)
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(vuz6700), Zero) → Succ(vuz6700)
new_gcd23(vuz116, vuz8, vuz115, vuz42) → new_gcd24(vuz116, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz115, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'120(vuz157, vuz158) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Pos(Succ(vuz158)), vuz157)
new_reduce2D0(vuz118, vuz27) → new_gcd22(vuz118, vuz27)
new_gcd216(Succ(vuz1250), Succ(vuz1290), vuz27) → new_gcd216(vuz1250, vuz1290, vuz27)
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Zero) → new_primDivNatS04(vuz109, vuz110)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Pos(Succ(vuz3100)))) → new_reduce2Reduce1(vuz30, vuz3100, new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)))
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
We used the non-termination processor [17] to show that the DP problem is infinite.
Found a loop by semiunifying a rule from P directly.
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
new_numericEnumFrom(vuz3) → new_numericEnumFrom(new_ps(vuz3))
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
new_gcd217(vuz127, vuz131, vuz126, vuz130, vuz27) → new_gcd22(new_primPlusNat0(vuz127, vuz131), vuz27)
new_primPlusNat2(Zero) → Zero
new_gcd26(Succ(vuz1230), Zero, vuz42) → new_gcd27(Succ(vuz1230), vuz42)
new_primQuotInt3(Zero, Succ(vuz7100), vuz42) → new_primQuotInt7(Succ(vuz7100), new_gcd21(vuz7100, vuz42))
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, vuz1620, vuz1630)
new_primQuotInt9(vuz67, vuz15, vuz68, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt7(new_primPlusNat0(vuz67, new_primMulNat0(vuz15)), new_reduce2D0(new_primPlusNat0(vuz67, new_primMulNat0(vuz15)), vuz27))
new_gcd22(Succ(vuz1180), Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'116(vuz270, vuz1180)
new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz151, vuz152) → new_gcd0Gcd'124(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz151), vuz152), vuz152)
new_gcd0Gcd'117(Neg(vuz1320), vuz420) → new_gcd0Gcd'124(vuz1320, vuz420)
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Neg(Zero))) → new_error0
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'124(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Succ(vuz1120)) → new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, vuz1110, vuz1120)
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Neg(Zero)) → new_error
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Zero, vuz420) → Pos(Succ(vuz420))
new_gcd21(vuz7100, Succ(vuz420)) → new_gcd0Gcd'116(vuz420, vuz7100)
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd27(Zero, Succ(vuz420)) → new_gcd0Gcd'125(vuz420)
new_gcd0Gcd'115(vuz200, vuz201) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Neg(Succ(vuz201)), vuz200)
new_gcd213(vuz127, vuz15, vuz126, vuz27) → new_gcd217(vuz127, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz126, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz27)
new_primDivNatS02(Zero, Succ(vuz86000)) → Zero
new_gcd27(Succ(vuz1070), Succ(vuz420)) → new_gcd0Gcd'121(vuz420, vuz1070)
new_gcd0Gcd'121(vuz420, vuz1070) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(new_abs0(vuz1070), vuz420)
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz165, vuz166)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Zero), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'112(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero, new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero))
new_primQuotInt5(vuz69, vuz8, vuz70, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(new_primPlusNat0(vuz69, new_primMulNat0(vuz8)), new_reduce2D(new_primPlusNat0(vuz69, new_primMulNat0(vuz8)), vuz42))
new_abs0(vuz6500) → Pos(Succ(vuz6500))
new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz148, vuz149) → new_gcd0Gcd'122(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz148), vuz149), vuz149)
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Pos(Zero))) → new_error0
new_gcd22(Zero, Zero) → new_error
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Zero) → Succ(vuz1090)
new_primQuotInt4(Neg(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt2(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_gcd25(vuz6500, Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'121(vuz270, vuz6500)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'123(vuz132000, Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, vuz2050, vuz2060)
new_primQuotInt3(Succ(vuz80), Zero, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(Succ(vuz80), new_reduce2D(Succ(vuz80), vuz42))
new_error0 → error([])
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Zero, Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'126(Succ(vuz165), vuz166)
new_reduce2Reduce10(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27, vuz26, Zero) → new_error0
new_gcd216(Zero, Zero, vuz27) → new_gcd214(vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz197, vuz198) → new_gcd0Gcd'112(new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198), vuz198, new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz197), vuz198))
new_primMulNat0(vuz8) → new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Succ(vuz8))
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz160, vuz161)
new_reduce2Reduce1(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42, vuz41, Succ(vuz430)) → :%(new_primQuotInt4(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42), new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, new_gcd210(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42)))
new_abs(vuz1180) → Pos(Succ(vuz1180))
new_reduce2D(vuz107, vuz42) → new_gcd27(vuz107, vuz42)
new_primQuotInt2(Succ(vuz710), vuz8, vuz72, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt3(vuz8, vuz710, vuz42)
new_gcd26(Zero, Succ(vuz1160), vuz42) → new_gcd21(vuz1160, vuz42)
new_gcd211(Neg(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_gcd213(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_gcd211(Pos(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_gcd212(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'120(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_gcd28(vuz114, vuz8, vuz113, vuz42) → new_gcd29(vuz114, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz113, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'126(Zero, Succ(vuz4200))
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Zero, Succ(vuz1120)) → Zero
new_gcd215(vuz125, vuz129, vuz124, vuz128, vuz27) → new_gcd216(vuz125, vuz129, vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Zero), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'122(new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Zero), Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz132000, Zero)
new_primQuotInt2(Zero, vuz8, vuz72, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(Succ(vuz8), new_reduce2D(Succ(vuz8), vuz42))
new_gcd21(vuz7100, Zero) → new_abs(vuz7100)
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Pos(Succ(vuz11700))) → Neg(new_primDivNatS2(vuz26, vuz11700))
new_gcd27(Succ(vuz1070), Zero) → new_abs0(vuz1070)
new_primDivNatS02(Zero, Zero) → Succ(Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Zero, vuz420) → Pos(Succ(vuz420))
new_gcd216(Zero, Succ(vuz1290), vuz27) → new_gcd22(Succ(vuz1290), vuz27)
new_gcd26(Zero, Zero, vuz42) → new_gcd27(Zero, vuz42)
new_primPlusNat2(Succ(vuz1900)) → Succ(vuz1900)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Zero, vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz18900, Zero)
new_primPlusNat1(Zero) → Succ(Zero)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Zero), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'115(Zero, Succ(vuz1870))
new_gcd210(Pos(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_gcd28(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Zero, Succ(vuz1630)) → new_gcd0Gcd'120(Succ(vuz160), vuz161)
new_primQuotInt6(Neg(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt9(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_primMulNat1(Zero) → Zero
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Pos(Zero)) → new_error
new_primDivNatS02(Succ(vuz850), Succ(vuz86000)) → new_primDivNatS03(vuz850, vuz86000, vuz850, vuz86000)
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(vuz6700), Succ(vuz150)) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat0(vuz6700, vuz150)))
new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, Succ(vuz1670), Succ(vuz1680)) → new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz165, vuz166, vuz1670, vuz1680)
new_gcd0Gcd'116(vuz420, vuz7100) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(new_abs(vuz7100), vuz420)
new_primQuotInt3(Succ(vuz80), Succ(vuz7100), vuz42) → new_primQuotInt3(vuz80, vuz7100, vuz42)
new_gcd22(Zero, Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Neg(Zero), vuz270)
new_primDivNatS02(Succ(vuz850), Zero) → Succ(new_primDivNatS3(vuz850, Zero))
new_primMinusNatS0(Zero, Succ(vuz1100)) → Zero
new_gcd214(Succ(vuz270)) → new_gcd0Gcd'125(vuz270)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(Succ(vuz18900)), Succ(vuz1870), vuz188) → new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz18900, Succ(vuz1870), vuz18900, vuz1870)
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Zero) → Zero
new_primDivNatS2(Zero, vuz8) → Zero
new_primQuotInt10(Zero, Zero, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt1(Zero, new_gcd214(vuz27))
new_gcd212(vuz125, vuz15, vuz124, vuz27) → new_gcd215(vuz125, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz124, new_primMulNat0(vuz15), vuz27)
new_gcd27(Zero, Zero) → new_error
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Pos(Zero)) → new_error
new_gcd210(Neg(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_gcd23(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, Neg(Succ(vuz11700))) → Pos(new_primDivNatS2(vuz26, vuz11700))
new_reduce2Reduce1(vuz7, vuz8, vuz42, vuz41, Zero) → new_error0
new_gcd26(Succ(vuz1230), Succ(vuz1160), vuz42) → new_gcd26(vuz1230, vuz1160, vuz42)
new_primQuotInt10(Succ(vuz6500), Zero, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt1(Succ(vuz6500), new_gcd25(vuz6500, vuz27))
new_primPlusNat1(Succ(vuz190)) → Succ(Succ(new_primPlusNat2(vuz190)))
new_primQuotInt8(Succ(vuz650), vuz15, vuz66, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt10(vuz650, vuz15, vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz160, vuz161, Succ(vuz1620), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'119(vuz160, vuz161)
new_gcd216(Succ(vuz1250), Zero, vuz27) → new_gcd25(vuz1250, vuz27)
new_gcd24(vuz116, vuz123, vuz115, vuz122, vuz42) → new_gcd26(vuz123, vuz116, vuz42)
new_primMulNat1(Succ(vuz31000)) → new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz31000))
new_primQuotInt3(Zero, Zero, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt1(Zero, new_reduce2D(Zero, vuz42))
new_primDivNatS3(vuz85, vuz8600) → new_primDivNatS02(vuz85, vuz8600)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz203, vuz204)
new_reduce2Reduce10(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27, vuz26, Succ(vuz280)) → :%(new_primQuotInt6(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27), new_primQuotInt7(vuz26, new_gcd211(vuz14, vuz15, vuz27)))
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Neg(Succ(vuz3100)))) → new_reduce2Reduce10(vuz30, vuz3100, new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)))
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Neg(Succ(vuz10600))) → Neg(new_primDivNatS2(vuz41, vuz10600))
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Neg(Zero)) → new_error
new_primQuotInt6(Pos(vuz140), vuz15, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt8(new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz15, new_primMulNat1(vuz140), vuz27)
new_gcd0Gcd'125(vuz420) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Pos(Zero), vuz420)
new_gcd0Gcd'124(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'127(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_error → error([])
new_primDivNatS2(Succ(vuz410), vuz8) → new_primDivNatS02(vuz410, vuz8)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Succ(vuz2050), Zero) → new_gcd0Gcd'114(vuz203, vuz204)
new_primQuotInt10(Zero, Succ(vuz150), vuz27) → new_primQuotInt7(Succ(vuz150), new_reduce2D0(Succ(vuz150), vuz27))
new_gcd29(vuz114, vuz121, vuz113, vuz120, vuz42) → new_gcd27(new_primPlusNat0(vuz114, vuz121), vuz42)
new_gcd22(Succ(vuz1180), Zero) → new_abs(vuz1180)
new_primDivNatS04(vuz109, vuz110) → Succ(new_primDivNatS2(new_primMinusNatS0(vuz109, vuz110), Succ(vuz110)))
new_gcd25(vuz6500, Zero) → new_abs0(vuz6500)
new_gcd0Gcd'112(Zero, vuz187, vuz188) → Neg(Succ(vuz187))
new_gcd0Gcd'126(vuz154, vuz155) → new_gcd0Gcd'112(Succ(vuz155), vuz154, Succ(vuz155))
new_primQuotInt4(Pos(vuz70), vuz8, vuz42) → new_primQuotInt5(new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz8, new_primMulNat1(vuz70), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'113(vuz203, vuz204, Zero, Succ(vuz2060)) → new_gcd0Gcd'115(Succ(vuz203), vuz204)
new_primQuotInt10(Succ(vuz6500), Succ(vuz150), vuz27) → new_primQuotInt10(vuz6500, vuz150, vuz27)
new_primQuotInt8(Zero, vuz15, vuz66, vuz27) → new_primQuotInt7(Succ(vuz15), new_reduce2D0(Succ(vuz15), vuz27))
new_primQuotInt1(vuz41, Pos(Succ(vuz10600))) → Pos(new_primDivNatS2(vuz41, vuz10600))
new_gcd0Gcd'117(Pos(vuz1320), vuz420) → new_gcd0Gcd'122(vuz1320, vuz420)
new_gcd214(Zero) → new_error
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Zero, Zero) → new_primDivNatS04(vuz109, vuz110)
new_gcd0Gcd'122(Succ(Succ(vuz132000)), Succ(vuz4200)) → new_gcd0Gcd'118(vuz132000, Succ(vuz4200), vuz132000, vuz4200)
new_primPlusNat0(Zero, Succ(vuz150)) → Succ(vuz150)
new_primPlusNat0(Succ(vuz6700), Zero) → Succ(vuz6700)
new_gcd23(vuz116, vuz8, vuz115, vuz42) → new_gcd24(vuz116, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz115, new_primMulNat0(vuz8), vuz42)
new_gcd0Gcd'120(vuz157, vuz158) → new_gcd0Gcd'117(Pos(Succ(vuz158)), vuz157)
new_reduce2D0(vuz118, vuz27) → new_gcd22(vuz118, vuz27)
new_gcd216(Succ(vuz1250), Succ(vuz1290), vuz27) → new_gcd216(vuz1250, vuz1290, vuz27)
new_primDivNatS03(vuz109, vuz110, Succ(vuz1110), Zero) → new_primDivNatS04(vuz109, vuz110)
new_primMinusNatS0(Succ(vuz1090), Succ(vuz1100)) → new_primMinusNatS0(vuz1090, vuz1100)
new_ps(:%(vuz30, Pos(Succ(vuz3100)))) → new_reduce2Reduce1(vuz30, vuz3100, new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)), new_primPlusNat1(new_primMulNat1(vuz3100)))
s = new_numericEnumFrom(vuz3) evaluates to t =new_numericEnumFrom(new_ps(vuz3))
Thus s starts an infinite chain as s semiunifies with t with the following substitutions:
- Matcher: [vuz3 / new_ps(vuz3)]
- Semiunifier: [ ]
Rewriting sequence
The DP semiunifies directly so there is only one rewrite step from new_numericEnumFrom(vuz3) to new_numericEnumFrom(new_ps(vuz3)).
Haskell To QDPs